In 2009, an engineer using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto introduced a new digital, open source, currency to the world called “Bitcoin”. Since then, the buzz, excitement, and adoption of bitcoins has grown at a phenomenal rate, with the total value of bitcoins in circulation hitting $1 billion as of April 2013. Talk of a bubble has coincided with the buzz, but both have also served to highlight the tremendous potential in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Great, so what is it really?

Paraphrasing from Wikipedia:

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency based on an open-source, peer-to-peer internet protocol. [...] Bitcoins can be exchanged through a computer or smartphone locally or internationally without an intermediate financial institution. [...]

Bitcoin is not managed like typical currencies: it has no central bank or central organization. Instead, it relies on an Internet-based peer-to-peer network. The money supply is automated and given to servers or “bitcoin miners” that confirm bitcoin transactions as they add them to a decentralized and archived transaction log approximately every 10 minutes.

I’m going to butcher any explanation I try to provide but Quora has several good writeups on what Bitcoins are and how they work. A reasonable analogy though, is think about “Bitcoins” as a type of precious metal that has no intrinsic value but is able to store value, transfer value between parties, and be mined to find new pieces.

The key takeaways about how Bitcoins work are:

  • Unlike traditional currencies, no central bank controls the amount of currency in circulation. Instead, the total amount of possible Bitcoins is algorithmically limited by the protocol itself.
  • Transactions between parties are relatively anonymous and done in real time. Contrast this with other digital payments like credit cards or wire transfers where there is little anonymity and a settling period.
  • As of now, there’s absolutely no regulation as far as reporting, security, or anything else you’d associate with traditional financial institutions.
  • Currently, it’s all digital – there’s no practical way to “print” a Bitcoin and use it like a dollar bill

So what’s going to be disruptive?

There are dozens if not hundreds of startups playing in the Bitcoin space and several “large” companies have also started adopting Bitcoins as an alternative form of payment. Several high profile investors including YCombinator and Union Square Ventures have also made significant Bitcoin related invetments, signalling that savvy investors believe a potential market exists. Personally, I’m excited about companies attacking the following:

Hassle free, instant, and international money transfer. Paypal was supposed to allow us to do this, but even in 2013 its difficult and expensive to transfer people money – let alone internationally. If someone can address the current concerns of fraud and money laundering using Bitcoin they’ll have an instant winner on their hands.

Catapult in legalized online gambling. In the last few years, there’s been an ongoing discussion about if America should legalize online gambling and if so, how it should be done. Because of the decentralized, anonymous nature of Bitcoin, it’s conceivable that the emergence of a large enough Bitcoin powered gambling market would force the US government to legalize online gambling in order to get access to the additional tax revenues. This would obviously be a boon for struggling social game companies like Zynga, but also provide an enormous opportunity for new startups.

Provide a viable alternative to credit cards. Recently, there’s been a lot of action in the payments space including innovative companies like Square and Roam which are aiming to alter how consumers pay at the point of sale. Unfortunately, almost all of these new payment solutions still rely on existing credit card infrastructure to complete the payment which leaves them at the whim of interchange fees. Boston based LevelUp is tackling this issue but at the end of the day they’re still getting hit by the fees somewhere. An innovative Bitcoin company which provides a viable alternative to this existing credit card infrastructure would open the door to radical innovation in the payments space by eliminating hard interchange fees.

What might go wrong?

There’s a huge amount of opportunity in the Bitcoin space and the ecosystem is just starting to build out. With the Bitcoin boom of 2012 already inked on the Wikipedia entry, the next few months are going to be a critical time for the nascent currency. The single largest to Bitcoin is ultimately going to be regulation from sovereign governments. The US Department of Treasury has already issued several statements regarding Bitcoin and its clear the government isn’t happy with the situation as it stands now.

Regardless of what regulation is passed, Bitcoins are technologically different from previous virtual currency and the ecosystem has already demonstrated its resilience and innovation.

Last month, a post started making the rounds on the internet decrying the dire state of the WordPress codebase. James highlights several legitimate gripes but unfortunately he muddles the discussion by mixing major problems with otherwise minor concerns. Another problem, is that James’ post considers the issues purely from a technical perspective but ultimately business concerns are going to motivate a drastic change in WordPress. Looking at James’ post and from my own run ins with WordPress, the biggest problems with WordPress as it exists now are:

Broken data model: As James pointed out, as people have started to use WordPress like a CMS with by adding things like custom post types and plugins it’s clear that the underlying data model is too rigid to properly support this need. The result of this, is that developing custom database functionality is notably difficult and it limits the types of extensions that can be built purely inside WordPress.

Limited separation of concerns: Throughout WordPress, globals are heavily used, templates are free to interact with the database, and there’s generally no concept of MVC separation. Apart from being confusing, this makes it difficult to effectively reason about the behavior of a WordPress install, making “smart” caching impossible. Additionally, it makes it difficult for dedicated “frontend” developers to work on templating since they’re often left juggling PHP code. Both of these issues ultimately make running a WordPress site more expensive since you’ll need more resources for operations and development.

No OO/Encapsulation, No Namespaces, No API: Owing to its PHP4+ heritage, the core WordPress code is entirely procedural and because of this every function touches the global namespace. Also, WordPress doesn’t have native support for serving as an API backend and exposing its data in different formats or interacting with non-browser clients. The OO and namespace issue is largely technical but it makes it difficult to develop modular WP components or mixin off the shelf PHP packages. The lack of a robust API makes it impossible to use a single WordPress installation to serve content on the web but also serve as a service for mobile clients, which ultimately limits its utility.

So how do we fix it?

“Fixing” an application as large as WordPress is obviously a herculean undertaking, especially because of the need to balance the existing ecosystem with the need for a clean, strong foundation. The reality is that modernizing WordPress is ultimately going to require a full rewrite but I think it could be strategically orchestrated to win community support for the backwards compatability breaks.

Without further ado, here’s how I would do it:

June ’13 – Release Twig for WordPress

Twig for WordPress is a fully featured implementation of the Twig templating engine for WordPress. It allows developers to write WordPress themes in Twig instead of mixing PHP and HTML. Along with Twig, the plugin includes modern template caching techniques like partial page rebuilds and ESI support. In order to leverage Twig and its related benefits, developers have to write their themes with reasonably strict View/Controller separation since variables must be explicitly passed to Twig templates.

Theme designers are initially hesitant but once they see how much easier tracing the structure of Twig templates is versus straight PHP they’re converts. Developers are also fans since they enjoy being able to make the necessary page variables available in a template and then hand pages off to be themed. Benchmarks are done. Hackathons are sponsored. Themes are converted to Twig.

September ’13 – Release Doctrine Power Tools (DPT)

Leveraging Doctrine2, DPT enhances WordPress by augmenting it with the Doctrine2 ORM and associated “power tools”. This allows developers to seamlessly create new MySQL tables and then automatically generate administration CRUD for those tables. In addition, custom plugin code can choose to leverage Doctrine2 to interact with the new tables. With DPT, WordPress administrators are also able to design custom forms to insert data into custom tables and then filter and export the data in these tables.

Developers familiar with ORMs are immediately excited and after they try it out they’re hooked. They start evangelizing DPT in the community because it takes the drudgery out of creating custom database functionality in WordPress. Enterprise users slowly get wind of it and adopt it as well since it empowers their marketing team to do more without involving developers. WordPress has an ORM. Everything isn’t being stuffed into wp_posts.

January ’14 – Release WP Paladin Alpha

WP Paladin is a PHP 5.3+ object oriented rewrite of WordPress with an additional “compatibility layer” which provides compatible legacy plugins and themes access to the normal WordPress API. From a user perspective, Paladin has the same installation procedure, Admin UI, and basic functionality as stock WordPress. Additionally, a handful of the most popular plugins have been ported to be 100% compatible with Paladin. Technically, WP Paladin shares several key Symfony2 components with Drupal 8, notably the HttpKernel, which allows interoperability with other apps using HttpKernel. It also supports Twig templating and ships with the Doctrine2 ORM and DPT.

Since Twig for WP was released in June ’13, dozens of Twig themes have become available and early adopters are eagerly experimenting with Paladin. Although it currently only supports a handful of traditional WordPress plugins, it’s faster, easier to develop on, and plays well with others. The excitement is palpable. Blog posts are written. SXSW tickets are bought.

March ’14 – Release WP Paladin Beta

WP Paladin Beta is similar to the initial release except the “compatibility layer” has been removed, critical bugs have been fixed, and the platform is significantly more stable. The beta version is launched at an exclusive SXSW party to a frenzied mob. It’s taken a little less than a year, but the WordPress codebase has been modernized and new features have added. Additionally, the most popular WordPress themes and plugins have been ported to be compatible with the Paladin codebase.

The download counter hits 1 million by the end of SXSW. Congratulations are in order. VC Money is raised.

Great, count me in!

Doing something like this would certainly be a great way to “earn your stripes” but ultimately it’s going to end up burning thousands of man hours for an unknown payoff.

But who knows, maybe a company with deep pockets, talented engineers, and a disposition for risk will give it the ole college try.

Posted in PHP.

The other day, I was hacking away on the PHP backend for the “Startup Institute” visualization and I realized it was going to need a good deal of array manipulation. Figuring it was as good a time as any, I decided to try and leverage PHP 5.3+ new closures along with the array_* functions to manipulate the arrays. I’m not well versed with functional programming but I’ve used Underscore.js’s array/collection functions so this is mostly in comparison to that.

The Array

The entire shebang is on GitHub but here is the gist of what we’re intersted in:

There is a CSV file that looks like ssdata.csv.sample except with more entries that is read into a list ($data) where every object has keys cooresponding to the values in the header. Thinking in JSON, the array ends up looking like:

Ok great, but now what can we do with it?

Sorting:

Using the usort function is particularly natural with closures. Compare the following:

It’s pretty clear the version with closures is much shorter, more conscience, and ultimately easier to follow. Being able to “capture” the local $sortKey variable is also a key feature on the closure version since with the static version there’s no easy way to introduce variables into the sorting function.

Mapping:

In the linked example, I used array_map to basically convert an array of characters into an array of ASCII values for those characters.

With such a small map function, it’s hard to see or appreciate the benefits of using the closure along with array_map. With the closure though, you’ll get a couple of benefits including isolated scope so that you won’t inadvertently rely on the value of a variable that isn’t directly related to transforming the array values.

Using the closure would also “look” much cleaner if the array had non-numeric keys, since without being able to use integer indexes the for(…) loop would be more confusing.

Filter it:

This isn’t used but it could have been to return only the elements that were selected.

Looking at the the version with the closure, its a bit easier to follow and since it’ll enforce scope isolation if the “truth test” was a bit more complicated you’d only have to debug what’s actually inside the closure. Also, not having to “skip” some elements leaves the code with a nicer feel and overall I’d argue its just better looking.

Overall Thoughts:

Overall, using closures with the array_* functions will definitely lead to cleaner, more concise, and easier to follow code. Unfortunately, there are a few rough spots. Like with most of the standard library, the argument order is inconsistent which is always a constant irritation. For example, for no apparent reason array_map is “callback, array” but array_filter is “array, callback”. Also, another irritation is that the “index” isn’t available inside several of the callbacks like on array_reduce or array_map.

Personally though, the biggest limitation is that none of the array_* functions will work with classes that implement the Traversable or Iterator interfaces. That means if you have a Doctrine_Collection and you want to reduce down to a single result you’re still stuck with a foreach(…).

Anyway, as always I’d love to hear other opinions in the comments.

Last week, we got our hands on the class list for the Spring ’13 Startup Institute class. I had some time to burn so I decided to throw together a visualization using the names and email addresses of the members of the class. You can check it out at http://symf.setfive.com/d3_startup_school/

How it works

Basically, the visualization represents every student with a 3×3 color grid by using various attributes of their names and email addresses. The various squares are calculated with the following formulas:

  • Top left: Calculated by taking the first letter of the first name (say C) and then converting it to a % for how far down the alphabet the letter is. So C would come out to 3 / 25 = 12% Then, this percentage value is applied to the “lightness” component of a HSL color tuple for “hsl(40,100%,92%)”
  • Top middle: Calculated by taking the length of the first name and then calculating a % for how long it is compared to the other names in the list. So basically, it finds the length of the longest name and then divides the current student’s name by that value for a %. The % is then used in the lightness component of “hsl(340,100%,73%)”
  • Top right: A color generated using the metaphone of the first name. The metaphone is generated, then split up into 3 pieces, and then the ASCII values of those 3 components are summed. Then, the 3 parts are mapped to HSL values depending on the % maximum they are for the entire sample size.
  • The second row is identical to the first except using the last name.
  • Bottom left: Calculated depending on the “track” that the user is in.
  • Bottom middle and right: These use the same metaphone algorithm except using the email address and email domain name respectively.

Technically, the squares are drawn using the d3 library and the page layout is done with Bootstrap.

Anyway, as always comments and feedback are welcome.

Earlier this week, a buddy of mine reached out looking for interesting Symfony2 resources that went beyond the “basic” tutorial type content. He was looking to really get into the “nitty gritty” of the framework, how larger projects are using it, and hopefully understand some of the philosophy behind service oriented architectures, dependency injection, and behavior driven development.

Not wanting to leave him hanging, Daum and I took to Slideshare to compile a list of presentations that we thought demonstrated some of these concepts well. Anyway, here is the list we came up with.

How Kris Writes Symfony Apps
You’ve seen Kris’ open source libraries, but how does he tackle coding out an application? Walk through green fields with a Symfony expert as he takes his latest “next big thing” idea from the first line of code to a functional prototype. Learn design patterns and principles to guide your way in organizing your own code and take home some practical examples to kickstart your next project.

Practical BDD with Behat and Mink
An introduction into behavior-driven development with Behat and Mink. A Symfony2 application is used for examples.
This was presented in the Top Shelf PHP tutorial at OSCON 2011: http://www.oscon.com/oscon2011/public/schedule/detail/18980
There were some issues converting from ODP, so a PDF version is here: http://jmikola.net/slides/20110725_bdd.pdf

BDD in Symfony2
Quality assurance is one of the most difficult things to implement around software development. Most of time it is left for the final phase of development and very often overlooked entirely. As many experienced web development teams already know, QA needs to be part of the development process from the get-go. Behavior development/testing is just one aspect of quality assurance. And we’ll talk about that.

Being Dangerous with Twig
Twig – the PHP templating engine – is easy to use, friendly and extensible. This presentation will introduce you to Twig and show you how to extend it to your bidding.

OpenSky Infrastructure

Dependency Injection in PHP 5.3/5.4

If you have other presentations you think we should check out, leave them in the comments or shoot us a tweet @setfive.