PHP: What if primitive types were objects?

A few days ago I ran across 2012: A Year in PHP which is a blog post highlighting what changed in PHP during 2012 and what upcoming changes we can expect in 2013. The post sparked a lively discussion on Hacker News which unfortunately basically devolved into a mix of anti-PHP rants and some “meta” commentary. Anyway, as someone that uses PHP daily I started thinking about what irks me about PHP and what would fix it. Thinking through the issues, it feels like fixing PHP’s type system by making primitives real objects would significantly improve the readability, consistency, and attractiveness of the language.

If strings were real objects...

This one is subjective but I think one of the reasons that PHP code looks so ugly is because the procedural array_* and str* functions look jarring mixed in with object oriented code.

Check out this snippet from the Doctrine ORM framework. Even though the code is “object oriented” and nicely spaced, the array_* and str* functions are a serious eye sore. In addition to looking “off”, the procedural functions have inconsistent argument ordering which leads to “needle or haystack?” bugs.

https://gist.github.com/4526962.js

So what would I switch to? How about a fluent interface replacement for the array and string functions that operate as if they were real objects.

https://gist.github.com/4526986.js

If arrays were real objects...

PHP arrays are in a funny place in terms of how they interact with the standard library and the syntax of PHP. Arrays in PHP are a primitive type and they are arguably the de-facto data structure for most PHP applications. Like strings though, arrays aren’t objects so programmers are stuck using the procedural array_* functions to manipulate arrays. Similar to above, if they were actually objects we could do away with the procedural functions and manipulate arrays with object oriented style functions.

Another array related issue is “foreach hell”, a situation where the easiest way to accomplish a few array related tasks is to run a “for each” over the list which then leaves the code with a tangled mess of collection variables and for each loops of varying lengths. PHP has array_* functions to mitigate this but it wasn’t until the proper introduction of closures and anonymous functions that they became practical to use. Unfortunately, since arrays aren’t objects you can’t really chain any of the functions and the code ends up looking as bad if not worse. If arrays were actually objects, PHP code could easily adopt functional techniques like Javascript’s UnderscoreJS which are usually cleaner and easier to follow.

Compounding the “foreach” issues is the existence of the Iterator interface which allows PHP classes to specifcy that they can be traversed using a foreach loop. This introduces a frustrating limitation in the sense that you can make an object “look” like an array but since the array_* functions only operate on the primitive array type, you can’t leverage any of them on iterable objects. If arrays were actually objects, additional interfaces could be specified to allow some subset of the array_* functions to work on a given class.

In true PHP fashion, arrays as objects actually “sort of” exist within the Standard PHP Library (SPL) Datastructures extension. The SplFixedArray provides a fixed length, integer only array data structure that is actually a PHP object. The problem is you can’t easily just “switch” between using an array versus one of the SPL data structures since they aren’t subsets or supersets of regular primitive arrays, they are PHP classes making them difficult to convert between.

If objects were real objects...

Unlike Java or Javascript, PHP objects don’t all “share” or extend from a common ancestor. In Java, every object extends the Object class and in Javascript every object is connected in the Prototpe chain to the Object prototype. What this shared inheritance fosters is that generic programming is significantly easier because introspection and reflection is more straightforward. Comparatively, check out PHP’s Reflection class to see how much of a disaster introspection and reflection in PHP.

Could it happen?

Unfortunately, I don’t know anything about how primitives PHP types work internally so I can’t speak to how difficult it would be to implement these changes. From a compatibility standpoint, it would naively seem like these changes could be made without seriously breaking backwards compatibility while slowly phasing out the old primitive types. On the whole, as long as we don’t end up with Java’s type boxing issues I think we’ll be in a much better place with PHP as a language.

PHP: Quick and dirty CLI tasks

Something that comes up every so often in a sufficiently large PHP project is having to write helper scripts that run on the command line to complete various tasks. It might be periodically processing some images, updating cached analytics, etc. If the project is a Symfony project, it’s usually easy enough to add a Symfony task and be able to leverage the Symfony infrastructure to manage the individual “scripts” as tasks. This is equally true with Drupal, using Drush tasks to manage the individual scripts works well and lets you have a single, central spot for all your “helpers”. But what if its a vanilla PHP project or WordPress?

A technique I’ve started using is to create a class and then add each of the tasks as static functions. This allows you to keep all the tasks in one place, reuse code and configurations, and generally mimic how Symfony tasks and Drush work. From there, the file pulls off $argv to figure out what function to call and just passes $argv in as an argument as well.

Here’s a stub of a class to set something like this up:

https://gist.github.com/4242571.js

SwiftMailer: Expected response code 250 but got code 421

Last week we deployed a background script for a client which was used intermitently to batch send a couple of hundred emails. We were using SwiftMailer but weren’t able to use the “Spool” strategy to send because the messages contained Unicode characters which was breaking the serialization. Anyway, we ended up with code that looked something like the following:

foreach( $toEmail in $listOfEmails ){
   $message = Swift_Message::newInstance()
        ->setFrom(sfConfig::get('app_sf_guard_plugin_default_from_email'))
        ->setTo( array(toEmail) )
        ->setSubject("...")
        ->setBody( "..." );
    sfContext::getInstance()->getMailer()->send($message);
   sleep(5);
}

Nothing to crazy going on. We were also sending the emails through Amazon SES which is why we introduced the sleep(..) to keep ourselves below the sending limits.

Things seemed like they were fine but then we’d seemingly randomly get the following exception:

PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught exception 'Swift_TransportException' with message 'Expected response code 250 but got code "421", with message "421 Timeout waiting for data from client.
"' in /usr/share/php/symfony/vendor/swiftmailer/classes/Swift/Transport/AbstractSmtpTransport.php:406
Stack trace:
#0 /usr/share/php/symfony/vendor/swiftmailer/classes/Swift/Transport/AbstractSmtpTransport.php(290): Swift_Transport_AbstractSmtpTransport->_assertResponseCode('421 Timeout wai...',$
#1 /usr/share/php/symfony/vendor/swiftmailer/classes/Swift/Transport/EsmtpTransport.php(197): Swift_Transport_AbstractSmtpTransport->executeCommand('MAIL FROM: <adm...', Array, Arra$
#2 /usr/share/php/symfony/vendor/swiftmailer/classes/Swift/Transport/EsmtpTransport.php(267): Swift_Transport_EsmtpTransport->executeCommand('MAIL FROM: <adm...', Array)
#3 /usr/share/php/symfony/vendor/swiftmailer/classes/Swift/Transport/AbstractSmtpTransport.php(441): Swift_Transport_EsmtpTransport->_doMailFromCommand('admin@chatthrea...')
#4 /usr/share/php/symfony/ve in /usr/share/php/symfony/vendor/swiftmailer/classes/Swift/Transport/AbstractSmtpTransport.php on line 406

After doing some digging around, it turns out Amazon’s SES service has a connection timeout which SwiftMailer was tripping up on. I couldn’t actually find an official published timeout limit but looking at the SwiftMailer code it seemed like it was possible to set a timeout inside Swift. We added a “timeout: 5” setting to our Symfony factories.yml file inside the SwiftMailer settings and it seemed to fix our issues.

AJAX Request Slow With PHP? Here's Why

Recently I was working on a project where we had a page which loads tons of data from numerous sources. I decided after a while that we wanted to AJAX each section of data so that the page would load a bit quicker. After splitting up the requests and sending them asyncronously, there was little improvement. I thought at first it may be due to the fact we were pinging a single API for most of the data multiple times, that wasn’t it. Maybe it was a browser limit? Nope was still far below the 6 requests most allow. I setup xdebug and kcachegrind and to my surprise it was the session_start() that was taking the most time on the requests.

I looked around the web for a while trying to figure out what in the world was going on. It turns out that PHP’s default session_start will block future session_starts for the same session until the session is closed. This is because the default method uses a file on the filesystem which it locks until you close it. If you want more information on this and how to close it you can read a bit more here.

We switched over to database based sessions and it fixed it. In symfony 1.4 the default session storage uses the file system, however switching over to http://trac.symfony-project.org/browser/branches/1.4/lib/storage/sfPDOSessionStorage.class.php">sfPDOSessionStorage is very easy and quick.

Facebook: How-to force users to LIKE page

With Facebook’s move to deprecate FBML for tabs the documentation around how to make a “please Like! before…” has become much more choppy and inconsistent. Anyway, I recently found myself in a position where I needed to make this happen so here goes.

With in-line FBML deprecated, the only way to accomplish this without using a third party branded solution is to create a Facebook iframe app. Here are the steps you need to take to get something up using PHP and the Facebook PHP SDK.

1. Create a new Facebook Application at https://developers.facebook.com/apps

2. Configure your new Facebook App the enable “Website” and “Page Tab”. You’ll need to enter a valid URL for the following fields:

  • Site URL
  • Page Tab URL
  • Secure Page Tab URL

You’ll also want to use a HTTPs URL since Facebook sessions default to HTTPs by default and your iframe will be marked insecure if its over vanilla HTTP. For this walk through, lets assume were using https://www.setfive.com/fb/index.php? as the URL.

3. Now, you’ll want to add your new App to a Facebook Page. The easiest way to do this is to use this URL https://www.facebook.com/dialog/pagetab?app_id=YOUR_APP_ID&amp;next=YOUR_URL replacing YOUR_APP_ID and YOUR_URL with your App ID and then a URL that is derived from your endpoint (or even just your endpoint). When you load that URL, you’ll be prompted to add your app to a page - select the page you want and submit the form.

4. The final piece is throwing together the actual PHP script. You’ll need the Facebook PHP SDK available on GitHub - https://github.com/facebook/php-sdk. Clone that and then this is the PHP script you’ll need:

<?php
require 'php-sdk/src/facebook.php';

$facebook = new Facebook(array(
  'appId'  => 'YOUR_APP_ID',
  'secret' => 'YOUR_APP_SECRET',
));

$req = $facebook->getSignedRequest();
?>

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"xmlns:fb="http://ogp.me/ns/fb#">
    
<head>
    <meta charset="utf-8" />
    <title></title>
</head>

<body>

<?php if( $req["page"]["liked"] ): ?>

	Content for users that have LIKED the page.

<?php else: ?>
	
	Content for users that HAVE NOT LIKED the page.
	
<?php endif; ?>

</body>

</html>

And thats it! Now you’ll be able to gate content from non-fans while growing the fanbase of your Facebook Page.

Drop any questions in the comments.