In the last few months there’s been a handful blog posts basically themed “Redshift vs. Hive”. Companies from Airbnb to FlyData have been broadcasting their success in migrating from Hive to Redshift in both performance and cost. Unfortunately, a lot of casual observers have interpreted these posts to mean that Redshift is a “silver bullet” in the big data space. For some background, Hive is an abstraction layer that executes MapReduce jobs using Hadoop across data stored in HDFS. Amazon’s Redshift is a managed “petabyte scale” data warehouse solution that provides managed access to a ParAccel cluster and exposes a SQL interface that’s roughly similar to PostgreSQL. So where does that leave us?

From the outside, Hive and Redshift look oddly similar. They both promise “petabyte” scale, linear scalability, and expose an SQL’ish query syntax. On top of that, if you squint, they’re both available as Amazon AWS managed services through Elastic Mapreduce and of course Redshift. Unfortunately, that’s really where the similarities end which makes the “Hive vs. Redshift” comparisons along the lines of “apples to oranges”. Looking at Hive, its defining characteristic is that it runs across Hadoop and works on data stored in HDFS. Removing the acronym soup, that basically means that Hive runs MapReduce jobs across a bunch of text files that are stored in a distribued file system (HDFS). In comparison, Redshift uses a data model similar to PostgreSQL so data is structured in terms of rows and tables and includes the concept of indexes.

OK so who cares?

Well therein lays the rub that everyone seem to be missing. Hadoop, and by extension Hive (and Pig) are really good at processing text files. So imagine you have 10 million x 1mb XML documents or 100GB worth of nginx logs, this would be a perfect use case for Hive. All you would have to do is push them into HDFS or S3, write a RegEx to extract your data and then query away. Need to add another 2 million documents or 20GB of logs? No problem, just get them into HDFS and you’re good to go.

Could you do this with Redshift? Sure, but you’d need to pre-process 10 million XML documents and 100GB of logs to extract the appropriate fields, and then create CSV files or SQL INSERT statements to load into Redshift. Given the available options, you’re probably going to end up using Hadoop to do this anyway.

Where Redshift is really going to excel is in situations where your data is basically already relational and you have a clear path to actually get it into your cluster. For example, if you were running three x 15GB MySQL databases with unique, but related data, you’d be able to regularly pull that data into Redshift and then ad-hoc query it with regular SQL. In addition, since the data is already structured you’d be able to use the existing format to create keys in Redshift to improve performance.

Hammers, screws, etc

When it comes down it, it’ll come down to the old “right tool for the right job” aphorism. As an organization, you’ll have to evaluate how your data is structured, the types of queries you’re interested in running, and what level of abstraction you’re comfortable with. What’s definitely true is that “enterprise” data warehousing is being commoditized and the “old guard” better innovate or die.

Posted In: Amazon AWS, Big Data, General

Tags: , , ,

As far as “big data” solutions go, Hive is probably one of the more recognizable names. Hive basically offers the end user an abstraction layer to run “SQL like” queries as MapReduce jobs across data that they have in HDFS. Concretely, say you had several hundred million rows of data and you wanted to count the number of unique IDs Hive would let you do that. One of the issues with Hadoop and by proxy Hive is that it’s notably difficult to setup a cluster to try things out. Tools like Whirr exist to make things easier they’re, a bit rough around the edges and in my experience hit up against “version hell”. One alternative that I’m surprised isn’t more popular is using Amazon’s Elastic Map Reduce to bootstrap a Hadoop cluster to experiment with.

Fire up the cluster

The first thing you’ll need to do is fire up an EMR cluster from the AWS backend. It’s mostly just point and click but the settings I used were:

  • Termination protection? No
  • Logging? Disabled
  • Debugging? Off since no logging
  • Tags – None
  • AMI Version: 2.4.2 (latest)
  • Applications to be installed:
  • Hive
  • Pig
  • Hardware Configuration:
  • One m1.small for the master
  • Two m1.small for the cores

The “security and access” section is important, you need to select an existing key pair that you have access to so that you can SSH into your master node to use the Hive CLI client.

Then finally, under Steps since you’re not specifying any pre-determined steps make sure you mark “Auto-terminate” as “No” so that the cluster doesn’t terminate immediately after it boots.

Click “Create Cluster” and you’re off to the races.

Pull some data, and load HDFS

Once the cluster launches, you’ll see a dashboard screen with a bunch of information about the cluster including the public DNS address for the “Master”. SSH into this machine using the user “hadoop” and whatever key you launched the cluster with:

Once you’re in, you’ll want to grab some data to play with. I pulled down Wikipedia Page View data since it’s just a bunch of gzipped text files which are perfect for Hive. You can pull down a chunk of files using wget, be aware though that the small EC2s don’t have much storage so you’ll need to keep an eye on your disk space.

Once you have some data (grab a few GB), the next step is to push it over to HDFS, Hadoop’s distributed filesystem. As an aside, Amazon EMR is tightly integrated with Amazon S3 so if you already have a dataset in S3 you can copy directly from S3 to HDFS. Anyway, to push your files to HDFS just run:

Build some tables, query some data!

And finally, it’s time to query some of the pageview data using Hive. The first step is to let Hive know about your data and what format it’s stored in. To do this, you need to create an external table that points to the location of the files that you just pushed to HDFS. Start the Hive client by running “hive” and then do the following:

Now select some data from your newly created table!

Pretty sweet huh? Now feel free to run any arbitrary query against the data. Note: since we used m1.small EC2s the performance of Hive/Hadoop is going to be pretty abysmal. But hey, give it a shot:

Anyway, don’t forget to tear down the cluster once you’re done. As always, let me know if you run into any issues!

Posted In: Big Data

Tags: , , ,

We’ve been using Hive a bit lately to help clients tackle some of their data needs and without a doubt one of the most powerful features is Hive’s SerDe functionality. Taking a step back, Hive is an open source Apache project that lets you run “SQL Like” queries using Hadoop on data that you have in HDFS. It’s a lot of moving pieces but what it fundamentally comes down to is that Hive will let you run what look like SQL queries across the text files that you have in HDFS. A typical use case would be using Hive to run ad-hoc queries across web server (like nginx) logs. Want to a breakdown of response times by frontend web server? Hive would let you do that.


SerDe is actually short for Serialize/Deserialize and its the mechanism that Hive uses to make sense of your text files in HDFS. Lets take a typical nginx log line:

Now the magic comes in how Hive uses a SerDe to translate a line like that into something that’s queryable. This is contrived but lets assume that for some reason we’re interested in querying on the client IP address and the request size of each log line. So we’d be interested in creating a table that looks like:

Turns out, Hive makes this particularly easy. You’d end up using the RegexSerDe to match a regular expression and then extract the two fields you’re interested in.

A custom one

The next step after extraction is to do some transformation during the extraction stage and this is where the custom SerDe comes in. For example, lets say that you wanted to geocode the client’s IP address and also convert your dates into Unix timestamps. So your table would be something like:

Your custom SerDe would let you do exactly this. You’d be able to use something like the MaxMind database to geocode your IP addresses and then use some extra Java to convert your timestamps.

Unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be too much documentation on how to actually write a custom class so here’s a couple of tidbits I’ve picked up:

  • It looks like at some point the SerDe class was refactored so depending on what Hive version you’re using you’ll need to extend a different class. On Hive 0.11 the class you’ll want to extend is “org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.SerDe”
  • You’ll need to include a couple of JARs in order to get the class to build. I had to include commons-logging-1.0.4.jar, hadoop-0.20.1-core.jar, hive-contrib-0.10.0-cdh4.4.0.jar, hive-exec-0.10.0-cdh4.4.0.jar, junit-4.5.jar
  • As noted above, you need to pull the specific versions of the JARs that you’re going to end up running this SerDe against
  • Make sure you target the right Java JRE version. If your servers are running Java 1.6 and you target 1.7 you end up getting really cryptic error messages.
  • If you create a table using your SerDe, you’ll need to have that JAR available to drop that table

The best way I’ve found to bootstrap this is to create an Eclipse project, include the necessary JARs, and then get the RegExSerDe to build inside the project. Once that works, test the JAR by creating a table using it and then you’ll be able to modify the class from there.

Even with my awful Java, the RegexSerDe class was easy enough to grok and then modify as needed.

Stuck? Need Help?

Drop me a comment or shoot me an email and I’ll do my best to help you out.

Posted In: Big Data

Tags: , , ,

I apologize for the buzzword heavy title but it was the best I could do. I couldn’t find a good quick start explaining how to get started with Hive so I thought I’d share my experiences.

Anyway, a client of ours came to us needing to analyze a dataset that was about ~200 million rows over 6 months and is currently growing at about 10 million rows a week and increasing. From a reporting standpoint, they were looking to run aggregate counts and group bys over the data and then display the results on charts. Additionally, they were also looking to select subsets of the data and use them later – basically SELECT * FROM table WHERE x AND y AND z.

Obviously, doing the calculations in real time was out of the question so we knew we were looking for a solution that would be easy to use, support the necessary requirements and that would predictably scale with the increasing generation rate of data.

On the surface, MySQL looks like a decent approach but it presents a couple of issues pretty quickly:

  • In order for the SUM, GROUP BY, and COUNT queries to be at all useful the MySQL tables would have to be heavily indexed. Unfortunately, due to the write heavy workload of the app this would mean having to copy data into an indexed MySQL database before running any reports.
  • Even with indexes, MySQL was pretty awful at selecting subsets of the data from a performance perspective.
  • And probably the biggest issue with MySQL is that it doesn’t scale linearly in the sense that if the data is growing at 500 million rows a week you can’t simply “throw more hardware” at it and be done with it.

With requirements in hand we hit the Internet and finally arrived at Hive running on top of Hadoop. Per Wikipedia,

From our perspective, this stack fits our requirements nicely since it doesn’t rely on keeping a second “reporting” MySQL database available, it will handle both sum/count/group by and selecting subets, and probably most importantly it will allow us at least in the near term to scale with the increasing rate of data generation.

“Apache Hadoop is a software framework that supports data-intensive distributed applications under a free license. It enables applications to work with thousands of nodes and petabytes of data. Hadoop was inspired by Google’s MapReduce and Google File System (GFS) papers.”

To grossly over simplify, Hadoop provides a framework that allows you to break up a data intensive task into discrete pieces, run the pieces in a distributed fashion, and then combine the results giving you the results of the completed task. The quintessential example of a task that can be parallelized in this fashion is sorting a *really* big list since the list can be sorted in pieces and then the results can be combined at the end. See Merge Sort

The second piece of the tool chain is Hive. Again via Wikipedia,

“Apache Hive is a data warehouse infrastructure built on top of Hadoop for providing data summarization, query, and analysis.Apache Hive is a data warehouse infrastructure built on top of Hadoop for providing data summarization, query, and analysis.”

Basically, Hive is a tool that leverages the Hadoop framework to provide reporting and query capabilities using a syntax similar to SQL.

That just leaves Sqoop, the app with a funny name and no Wikipedia entry. Sqoop was originally developed by Cloudera and basically serves as an import tool for Hadoop. For my purposes, it allowed me to easily import the data from my MySQL database into Hadoop’s HDFS so I could use it in Hive.

The rest of this post walks you through setting up Hadoop+Hive and analyzing some MySQL data.

Now that you know the players, lets figure out what we’re actually trying to do.

  1. We want to start a Hadoop cluster to use Hive on.
  2. Load our data from a MySQL database into this Hadoop cluster.
  3. Use Hive to run some reports on this data.
  4. Warehouse the results of this data in MySQL so we can graph it (not that exciting).

Starting the cluster

Theres actually one more tool you’ll need to get this to work – Apache Whirr. Whirr is actually really cool, it lets you automatically start cluster services (Hadoop, Voldermont, etc.) at a handful of cloud platforms (AWS, Rackspace, etc.)

NOTE: We exclusively use AWS for our hosting so everything described here is specific to AWS.

Fisrt, download the latest copy of Whirr – http://www.fightrice.com/mirrors/apache//incubator/whirr/ to your local machine. Whirr should work everywhere but these directions will match up against Linux/OSX the best.

The first thing you’ll need is a Whirr configuration file describing the cluster you want to build. Create a file called hadoop.properties and paste in the following:

whirr.instance-templates=1 hadoop-namenode+hadoop-jobtracker,2 hadoop-datanode+hadoop-tasktracker




There isn’t a ton going on in the file but you’ll need to switch out the credential lines for your AWS credentials. Also, you’ll need to double check that the ssh paths are accurate for your account.

The next step, is to actually launch the cluster. To do this run this command – double check the path to your hadoop.properties file is accurate:

./bin/whirr launch-cluster --config hadoop.properties

Just give it a few minutes, you’ll see a bunch of debug info scrolling across your terminal and hopefully a success message once its done. At this point, you’ll have a fully built Hadoop cluster with 3 nodes as described in your properties file ( 1 hadoop-namenode+hadoop-jobtracker,2 hadoop-datanode+hadoop-tasktracker ).

You can see all your nodes by checking out your Whirr cluster directory.

cat ~/.whirr/hadoop/instances

Prepping and loading the cluster

Now that the cluster is up, you’ll need to prep it and then load your data with Sqoop.

One of the most irritating “gotchas” I stumbled across was that Whirr adds the firewall rules necessary for Hadoop to its AWS security group.

Before you do anything, open your EC2 control panel and modify the new Whirr security group (#jcloud-something) so that all of your nodes can connect to each other on port 3306 (MySQL)

The next step is to install mysql-client across the entire cluster since Sqoop uses mysqldump to get at your data. You could manually ssh into every machine but Whirr provides a convenient “run-script” command to do just that.

Create a file called “prepCluster.sh” and put “sudo apt-get -q -y install mysql-client” in it. Then make sure the paths are right and run,

./bin/whirr run-script --script prepCluster.sh --config hadoop.properties

Once its done, you’ll see the aptitude output from all your nodes as they downloaded the MySQL client.

The next step is to install mysql-server, hive, and sqoop on the jobtracker. Doing this is pretty straightforward, look at the .whirr/hadoop/instances file from above and copy the namenode hostname.

Next, ssh in to that machine using your current username as the username. Once you’re in, just run the following to install everything:

sudo apt-get -q -y install sqoop
sudo apt-get -q -y install hadoop-hive
sudo apt-get -q -y install screen

NOTE: You’ll also need the MySQL ConnectorJ library so that Sqoop can connect to MySQL. Download it here and place it in “/usr/lib/sqoop/lib/”

Once everything is done installing, you’ll most likely want to move your MySQL data directories from their default location onto the /mnt partition since it’s much larger. Check out this article for a good walk through. Don’t forget to update AppArmour or MySQL won’t start. Once MySQL is setup, load the data you want to crunch.

Now, you’ll need to use Sqoop to load the data from the MySQL database into Hadoop’s HDFS. While logged into the jobtracker node you can just run the following to do that. You’ll need to swap out the placeholders in the command and change the u/p.

sqoop-import-all-tables --connect jdbc:mysql://[IP of your jobtracker]/[your db_name] --username root --password root --verbose --hive-import

Once it completes, Sqoop will have copied all your MySQL data into Hadoop’s HDFS file system and initialized Hive for you.

Crunching the data

Run “hive” on the jobtracker and you’ll be ready to start crunching your data.

Check out the Hive language manual for more info on exactly what queries you can write.

Once you’ve narrowed down how to write your queries, you can use Hive’s “INSERT OVERWRITE LOCAL DIRECTORY” command to output the results of your query into a local directory.

Then, the next step would be to TAR up these results and use scp to copy the results back to your local machine to analyze or warehouse.

Shutting it down

The final thing you’ll need to do is shut down the cluster. Whirr makes it pretty easy:

./bin/whirr destroy-cluster --config hadoop.properties

Give it a few minutes and Whirr will shutdown the cluster and clean up the EC2 security group as well.

Anyway, hope this walk through proves useful for someone. As always, feedback, questions, and comments are all more than welcome.

Posted In: Amazon AWS, Demo

Tags: , , , ,